FY26 Contract Spending payments
$877,841,911
FY26 Contract Spending total from the official dataMontgomery view as checked on 2026-05-20. This is payment activity, not the full operating budget and not final FY26 audited spending.
Contract spending
Montgomery County, Maryland Contract Spending, Explained
This page uses Montgomery County's official Contract Spending dataset to show payment activity at a high level. It is built for context, not vendor ranking or personal lookup.
Data status: FY26 actual contract spending records
Last checked: 2026-05-20. The official Contract Spending view is payment data. FY26 is treated as year-to-date until the fiscal year closes and the source is refreshed.
The Short Version
FY26 Actual OtherThe official Contract Spending view showed $877,841,911 in FY26 actual payment records when checked on 2026-05-20.
This page aggregates by fiscal year and named vendor organization. It does not publish personal addresses, contract-by-contract lookup, or pages that single out individuals.
A large payment total does not prove waste, quality, need, or full contract value. It only shows payment activity in the official dataset.
How To Read County Contract Spending
The Contract Spending view is about payments made to vendors with county contracts. It is useful for seeing broad payment activity, but it is not the same thing as the operating budget, the capital budget, or a full contract document.
Read each amount with its fiscal year, version label, and source. FY26 figures on this page are labeled Actual because they come from payment records, but they should still be read as year-to-date until the source is complete for that fiscal year.
Vendor names can reflect several kinds of work, including vehicles, waste services, construction, technology, human services, or pass-through arrangements. The official source should be checked before drawing conclusions about one payment line.
Recent Contract Spending Totals
The bars compare recent fiscal-year payment totals in the official Contract Spending view. FY26 is year-to-date as checked on 2026-05-20.
How to read this chart: longer bars mean larger payment totals in the official view. Dollar amounts are rounded for display and repeated in the table below.
FY26
$877,841,911
FY25
$1,186,525,447
FY24
$1,118,631,318
FY23
$1,086,524,659
FY22
$922,897,086
| Fiscal Year | Actual Payments In Source View | Note |
|---|---|---|
| FY26 | $877,841,911 | Year-to-date in the official view as checked on 2026-05-20. |
| FY25 | $1,186,525,447 | Fiscal-year total in the official Contract Spending view. |
| FY24 | $1,118,631,318 | Fiscal-year total in the official Contract Spending view. |
| FY23 | $1,086,524,659 | Fiscal-year total in the official Contract Spending view. |
| FY22 | $922,897,086 | Fiscal-year total in the official Contract Spending view. |
FY26 Named Vendor Organization Examples
These are the highest named organization totals in the FY26 Contract Spending view after excluding purely numeric vendor values. The list is a payment summary, not a ranking of program importance.
Use the table to see payment scale, then check the official source and procurement records for contract details.
Rows that appeared only as numbers were left out of the public named-vendor list. This page is meant to explain organization-level payment patterns, not help identify people.
| Named Organization | FY26 Actual Payments |
|---|---|
| GILLIG LLC | $57,374,270 |
| UNITY DISPOSAL & RECYCLING LLC | $27,992,152 |
| NORTHEAST MARYLAND WASTE DISPOSAL AUTHORITY | $25,785,356 |
| MANUEL LUIS CONSTRUCTION CO INC | $21,834,005 |
| CRISWELL PERFORMANCE CARS INC | $16,895,764 |
| TRANSDEV FLEET SERVICES INC | $15,401,257 |
| D AND F CONSTRUCTION INC | $14,530,637 |
| DOYLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY | $12,807,113 |
| DUSTIN CONSTRUCTION INC | $12,763,502 |
| SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP | $12,160,750 |
What Contract Spending Does Not Tell You
Contract spending does not tell you whether a contract was a good deal, whether the work was performed well, or whether a department should have chosen a different approach. Those questions require contract documents, procurement context, performance information, and sometimes Council or department records.
It also does not show the full contract ceiling, all future obligations, or the total budget for a department. A vendor can be paid from several programs, funds, or fiscal years.
This page intentionally avoids personal addresses, pages about individuals, and contract-by-contract lookup because the public value here is the broad spending pattern, not exposing private details.
What People Often Misunderstand
A large vendor total can reflect expensive equipment, countywide services, construction timing, or payments that flow through a specific entity. It should not be read as evidence of waste by itself.
The official dataset can also change as records are added, protected, corrected, or refreshed. If a total matters for a public claim, check the source date and the official record before repeating it.